| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Neha Sharma <neha(dot)sharma(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [TRAP: FailedAssertion] causing server to crash |
| Date: | 2017-08-10 15:25:42 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaQ_pq3e0QL-V-J6aqBPouqwBpO=Lkc9D6UDe6WDqPUHw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I think so - specifically, that it's a leftover from a revision where the
> xid limit was advanced before clog truncation.
>
> I'll be finding time in the next couple of days to look more closely and
> ensure that's all it is.
A couple of days having gone by without hearing further on this, I'm
going to assume for the moment that my analysis is correct and just
push a commit to remove this assertion. That's not intended to
discourage you from spending further time on this - it would be bad to
be wrong about this - but doing something we all agree is wrong can't
be better than doing something that I, at least, think is correct.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-08-10 15:31:39 | Re: [TRAP: FailedAssertion] causing server to crash |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2017-08-10 15:23:33 | Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows |