| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Error-safe user functions |
| Date: | 2022-12-05 17:50:47 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaQ-22uoTtrp5PdRbaBOeibnTozRDWESvzMnB1t6F9s=Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 12:44 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > AIUI, the macro never returns in the sense of using the return
> > statement, unlike PG_RETURN_WHATEVER(), which do.
>
> Oh! Now I see what you don't like about it. I thought you
> meant "return to the call site", not "return to the call site's
> caller". Agreed that that could be confusing.
OK, good. I couldn't figure out what in the world we were arguing
about... apparently I wasn't being as clear as I thought I was.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2022-12-05 17:51:49 | Re: Error-safe user functions |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2022-12-05 17:45:46 | Re: Collation version tracking for macOS |