Re: [RFC] Incremental backup v2: add backup profile to base backup

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Incremental backup v2: add backup profile to base backup
Date: 2014-10-06 15:55:30
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaPXp=S5OSQKqZXZ52G0fx2Bx5qVKXnkpjdu_C+hBVodQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Marco Nenciarini
<marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> wrote:
> I agree that a full backup does not need to include a profile.
>
> I've added the option to require the profile even for a full backup, as
> it can be useful for backup softwares. We could remove the option and
> build the profile only during incremental backups, if required. However,
> I would avoid the needing to scan the whole backup to know the size of
> the recovered data directory, hence the backup profile.

That doesn't seem to be buying you much. Calling stat() on every file
in a directory tree is a pretty cheap operation.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gabriele Bartolini 2014-10-06 16:00:40 Re: [RFC] Incremental backup v2: add backup profile to base backup
Previous Message Marco Nenciarini 2014-10-06 15:51:11 Re: [RFC] Incremental backup v2: add backup profile to base backup