From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Add protransform for numeric, varbit, and temporal types |
Date: | 2012-02-07 17:43:11 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaPGLz9qHenEE=k7QsrsfZcyjmkeGCWF1Tww+kb2f7i6A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>> Building on commit 8f9fe6edce358f7904e0db119416b4d1080a83aa, this adds
>> protransform functions to the length coercions for numeric, varbit, timestamp,
>> timestamptz, time, timetz and interval. This mostly serves to make more ALTER
>> TABLE ALTER TYPE operations avoid a rewrite, including numeric(10,2) ->
>> numeric(12,2), varbit(4) -> varbit(8) and timestamptz(2) -> timestamptz(4).
>> The rules for varbit are exactly the same as for varchar. Numeric is slightly
>> more complex:
>>
>> * Flatten calls to our length coercion function that solely represent
>> * increases in allowable precision. Scale changes mutate every datum, so
>> * they are unoptimizable. Some values, e.g. 1E-1001, can only fit into an
>> * unconstrained numeric, so a change from an unconstrained numeric to any
>> * constrained numeric is also unoptimizable.
>>
>> time{,stamp}{,tz} are similar to varchar for these purposes, except that, for
>> example, plain "timestamptz" is equivalent to "timestamptz(6)". interval has
>> a vastly different typmod format, but the principles applicable to length
>> coercion remain the same.
>>
>> Under --disable-integer-datetimes, I'm not positive that timestamp_scale() is
>> always a no-op when one would logically expect as much. Does there exist a
>> timestamp such that v::timestamp(2) differs from v:timestamp(2)::timestamp(4)
>> due to floating point rounding? Even if so, I'm fairly comfortable calling it
>> a feature rather than a bug to avoid perturbing values that way.
>>
>> After these patches, the only core length coercion casts not having
>> protransform functions are those for "bpchar" and "bit". For those, we could
>> only optimize trivial cases of no length change. I'm not planning to do so.
>
> This is cool stuff. I will plan to review this once the CF starts.
I've committed the numeric and varbit patches and will look at the
temporal one next. I did notice one odd thing, though: sometimes we
seem to get a rebuild on the toast index for no obvious reason:
rhaas=# set client_min_messages=debug1;
SET
rhaas=# create table foo (a serial primary key, b varbit);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "foo_a_seq" for
serial column "foo.a"
DEBUG: building index "pg_toast_16430_index" on table "pg_toast_16430"
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index
"foo_pkey" for table "foo"
DEBUG: building index "foo_pkey" on table "foo"
CREATE TABLE
rhaas=# alter table foo alter column b set data type varbit(4);
DEBUG: rewriting table "foo"
DEBUG: building index "foo_pkey" on table "foo"
ALTER TABLE
rhaas=# alter table foo alter column b set data type varbit;
DEBUG: building index "pg_toast_16430_index" on table "pg_toast_16430"
ALTER TABLE
Strangely, it doesn't happen if I add another column to the table:
rhaas=# set client_min_messages=debug1;
SET
rhaas=# create table foo (a serial primary key, b varbit, c varbit);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "foo_a_seq" for
serial column "foo.a"
DEBUG: building index "pg_toast_16481_index" on table "pg_toast_16481"
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index
"foo_pkey" for table "foo"
DEBUG: building index "foo_pkey" on table "foo"
CREATE TABLE
rhaas=# alter table foo alter column b set data type varbit(4);
DEBUG: building index "pg_toast_16490_index" on table "pg_toast_16490"
DEBUG: rewriting table "foo"
DEBUG: building index "foo_pkey" on table "foo"
ALTER TABLE
rhaas=# alter table foo alter column b set data type varbit;
ALTER TABLE
There may not be any particular harm in a useless rebuild of the TOAST
table index (wasted effort excepted), but my lack of understanding of
why this is happening causes me to fear that there's a bug, not so
much in these patches as in the core alter table code that is enabling
skipping table and index rebuilds.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-02-07 17:47:52 | Re: When do we lose column names? |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2012-02-07 17:39:19 | Re: some longer, larger pgbench tests with various performance-related patches |