Re: Combine Prune and Freeze records emitted by vacuum

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Subject: Re: Combine Prune and Freeze records emitted by vacuum
Date: 2024-03-30 12:00:23
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaOsjLpXpABTf0NP_JSiP_C_TzewV9DKHvsEZ3hTY0HLg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 1:57 AM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think that we are actually successfully removing more RECENTLY_DEAD
> HOT tuples than in master with heap_page_prune()'s new approach, and I
> think it is correct; but let me know if I am missing something.

/me blinks.

Isn't zero the only correct number of RECENTLY_DEAD tuples to remove?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2024-03-30 12:40:43 Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands
Previous Message Ranier Vilela 2024-03-30 11:36:55 Fix out-of-bounds in the function PQescapeinternal (src/interfaces/libpq/fe-exec.c)