Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Extend framework from commit 53be0b1ad to report latch waits.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Extend framework from commit 53be0b1ad to report latch waits.
Date: 2016-10-14 15:38:21
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaNfO-j6CLudGcm41G3+L0iTw48maox=R=LNfGicJoByA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Well, the purpose of make all or make world is to build the things that
>>> are to be installed by make install or make install-world, which is the
>>> stuff that users want to use.
>
>> Well, I think what Tom, Andres, Michael, and I are saying is precisely
>> that we should review this approach and revise it so that 'make world'
>> builds everything. Or else add 'make universe' to really build
>> everything, but personally I think that's an unnecessary complication.
>
> Not sure. There's something to be said for the equivalence Peter
> proposes above. What you actually wanted, as I understood it, was
> that "make world" plus "make check-world" should test absolutely
> everything. I don't have a problem with the idea that some bits
> of test scaffolding don't get built until you do "make check-world".
> The real problem here is that "make check-world" missed some tests,
> which Peter agrees is a bug.

No, the problem is that worker_spi has no tests, so 'make check-world'
never tries to build it at all. Something in the buildfarm does cause
it to get built, though.

> Andres complained about insufficient parallelism in the "check"
> target, but that seems to me to be something to address separately;
> redefining the set of actions to be taken is not the way to fix that.

Sure, that's another issue.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-10-14 16:10:14 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Extend framework from commit 53be0b1ad to report latch waits.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-10-14 15:33:52 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Extend framework from commit 53be0b1ad to report latch waits.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2016-10-14 15:50:39 Re: make coverage-html on OS X
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-10-14 15:33:52 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Extend framework from commit 53be0b1ad to report latch waits.