| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Some thoughts on NFS |
| Date: | 2019-02-19 18:58:22 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaMyuy88+0_s1guwKjtMPEZB66akLhKAcndo06zTKsvzQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:56 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> My point is that for iSCSC to be performant we'd need *all* the
> infrastructure we also need for direct IO *and* a *lot* more. And that
> it seems insane to invest very substantial resources into developing our
> own iSCSI client when we don't even have DIO support. And DIO support
> would allow us to address the error reporting issues, while also
> drastically improving performance in a lot of situations. And we'd not
> have to essentially develop our own filesystem etc.
OK, got it. So, I'll merge the patch for direct I/O support tomorrow,
and then the iSCSI patch can go in on Thursday. OK? :-)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-02-19 19:02:32 | Re: WAL insert delay settings |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-02-19 18:56:21 | Re: Some thoughts on NFS |