| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff |
| Date: | 2015-09-02 18:36:51 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaMV1yF1qEyfba0XwqEPCpMJzD2nTS+XcUVyS-mo1RddA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
>> I'm wondering if percentages instead of weights would be a better
>> idea. That'd mean you'd be forced to be more careful when adding another
>> script (having to adjust the percentages of other scripts) but arguably
>> that's a good thing?
>
> If you use only percent, then you have to check that the total is 100,
> probably you have to use floats, to do something when the total is not 100,
> checking would complicate the code and test people mental calculus
> abilities. Not sure this is a good idea:-)
I agree. I don't see a reason to enforce that the total of the
weights must be 100.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-09-02 18:41:46 | Re: Horizontal scalability/sharding |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-09-02 18:27:03 | Re: Horizontal scalability/sharding |