| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Waits monitoring |
| Date: | 2015-09-08 17:01:23 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaKyg2p5ni_HeVxp-7U7AJ3B9k3rqPshmcBA6Zp1HE2iQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Ildus Kurbangaliev
<i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>> > Ildus, could you please review Amit & Robert's patch?
>> [1] -
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1KdeC1Tm5ya9gkV85Vtn4qqsRxzKJrU-tu70G_tL1xkFA@mail.gmail.com
> About [1] and [2]. They are slightly conflicting, but if [1] is
> going to be committed I can easily use it in [2]. And it will simplify
> my patch, so I have no objections here. And the same time [3] can be
> significantly simplified and improved on top of [1] and [2].
Great - let's try to deal with [1] first, then.
Does anyone wish to object to me committing that part?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-09-08 17:22:11 | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. |
| Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2015-09-08 17:00:11 | Re: gin_fuzzy_search_limit and postgresql.conf.sample |