Re: [DOCS] HOT - correct claim about indexes not referencing old line pointers

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] HOT - correct claim about indexes not referencing old line pointers
Date: 2024-03-21 17:09:24
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaKvVnYHzcngUv58Ce3FZzksaKuAuWBoyurWUxwiZHHzQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 9:07 PM James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> If the goal here is the most minimal patch possible, then please
> commit what you proposed. I am interested in improving the document
> further, but I don't know how to do that easily if the requirement is
> effectively "must only change one specific detail at a time".

So, yesterday I wrote a long email on how I saw the goals here.
Despite our disagreements, I believe we agree that the text I proposed
is better than what's there, so I've committed that change now. I've
also marked the CF entry as committed. Please propose the other
changes you want separately.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2024-03-21 17:09:44 Re: add AVX2 support to simd.h
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-03-21 17:00:39 Re: Slow GRANT ROLE on PostgreSQL 16 with thousands of ROLEs