Re: replacing role-level NOINHERIT with a grant-level option

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: replacing role-level NOINHERIT with a grant-level option
Date: 2022-08-26 18:46:59
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaKMnde2W_=u7CqeCKi=FKnfbNQPwOR=c_3c8qD7b2nhQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 10:19 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:23 AM tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > On 8/24/22 12:28 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > > This patch needed to be rebased pretty extensively after commit
> > > ce6b672e4455820a0348214be0da1a024c3f619f. Here is a new version.
> > Thanks, Robert, I have retested this patch with my previous scenarios
> > and things look good to me.
>
> I read through this again and found a comment that needed to be
> updated, so I did that, bumped catversion, and committed this.

Upon further review, this patch failed to update the documentation as
thoroughly as would have been desirable.

Here is a follow-up patch to correct a few oversights.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-docs-Fix-up-some-out-of-date-references-to-INHERI.patch application/octet-stream 5.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Imseih (AWS), Sami 2022-08-26 18:50:41 Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2022-08-26 18:24:03 Re: use ARM intrinsics in pg_lfind32() where available