Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6
Date: 2016-05-05 18:41:03
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaHhAynh=q5pDc3UHR4z0mNf_+wWgV5dBkT4S2h_7ve-w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> * As is somewhat customary for early drafts of the notes, I've made no
> attempt to call out which are the most significant changes. I've not
> tried to isolate the non-backwards-compatible items, either.

There was quite a bit of discussion of this on pgsql-advocacy, and the
press release we're going to put out surely must say something. It
wouldn't hurt if the release notes at least somewhat matched that. I
thought this was a decent list:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/571FB941.3020007@commandprompt.com

Although "phrase search" seems a bit less important to me than the
rest of those. There's also a good, somewhat-more-inclusive list of
the big stuff here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PostgreSQL#Upcoming_features

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-05-05 18:46:14 Re: Postgres 9.6 scariest patch tournament
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-05-05 18:38:31 Re: Postgres 9.6 scariest patch tournament