From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Do we create a new roadmap page for development? |
Date: | 2017-03-21 16:36:22 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaGqUW3O8sh4K6wne10U8DVDENz8iQKJ4Dx2OHN=0jXDw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:36 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> I'd like to share our roadmap for PostgreSQL development, as other companies and individuals do in the following page. But this page is for PostgreSQL 10.
>
> PostgreSQL10 Roadmap
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL10_Roadmap
>
> Should I create a page for PostgreSQL 11 likewise? Or, do you want a more stable page named "PostgreSQL Roadmap" instead of "PostgreSQL11 Roadmap" and attach the target version to each feature as in "Feature X (V11)", so that we can represent more longer-term goals?
I think a page that's just called PostgreSQL Roadmap will get out of
date pretty quickly. Ultimately it'll end up like the TODO list,
which is not really a list of things TO DO. The advantage of the
version-specific pages is that old information kind of ages its way
out of the system.
> And, why don't we add a link to the above roadmap page in the "Development information" page?
>
> Development information
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Development_information
I'm sure nobody will object to you doing that. It's a wiki, and
intended to be edited.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-03-21 16:49:49 | Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-21 16:33:35 | Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode |