Re: Functions used in index definitions shouldn't be changed

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: "Tom Lane *EXTERN*" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Functions used in index definitions shouldn't be changed
Date: 2014-11-20 19:11:31
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaGXzNeh08SOR13A3=sNyR135rREPmxXB-wStcjnCi6hQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> wrote:
> I don't think that there is a universally compelling right or wrong to
> questions like this, it is more a matter of taste. Is it more important to protect
> the casual DBA from hurting himself or herself, or is it more important to
> provide a well honed scalpel for the experienced surgeon?

+1.

I think if we had an already-existing prohibition here and you
proposed relaxing it, the howls would be equally loud. We're not
entirely consistent about how picky we are.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-11-20 19:25:41 Ripping out dead code for mark/restore in some plan types
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-11-20 19:03:49 Re: Doing better at HINTing an appropriate column within errorMissingColumn()