Re: Performance degradation in Bitmapscan (commit 75ae538bc3168bf44475240d4e0487ee2f3bb376)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance degradation in Bitmapscan (commit 75ae538bc3168bf44475240d4e0487ee2f3bb376)
Date: 2016-11-18 13:00:40
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaEFmhwZv9nJGT1=M5OrdcNL48D48Sykj5xXKXCLYs=0A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I've a working fix for this, and for a similar issue Robert found. I'm
> still playing around with it, but basically the fix is to make the
> growth policy a bit more adaptive.

Any chance you can post a patch soon?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2016-11-18 13:21:27 Re: Parallel execution and prepared statements
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2016-11-18 12:20:21 Tuple count used while costing MergeAppend and that for an append rel