From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_rewind: Fix some problems when copying files >2GB. |
Date: | 2017-08-28 14:08:44 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaDdiOL4DFS07ynmfYJw5kOZwixP83G1YKoV4xRAuH-=g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> pg_rewind: Fix some problems when copying files >2GB.
>
> I just noticed that this broke pg_rewind translation, because of the
> INT64_FORMAT marker in the translatable string. The message catalog now
> has this:
>
> msgid "received chunk for file \"%s\", offset "
>
> for this source line:
>
> pg_log(PG_DEBUG, "received chunk for file \"%s\", offset " INT64_FORMAT ", size %d\n",
> filename, chunkoff, chunksize);
>
> I don't think that this is terribly valuable as a translatable string,
> so my preferred fix would be to have a new function pg_debug() here
> where the messages are *not* marked for translations.
I am fine with however you want to handle it, but it seems odd to me
that we don't have a way of embedding INT64_FORMAT in a translatable
string. Surely that's going to be a problem in some case, sometime,
isn't it?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-28 14:15:05 | pgsql: Fix over-aggressive sanity check in misc_sanity.sql. |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-08-28 13:05:45 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_rewind: Fix some problems when copying files >2GB. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-08-28 14:16:31 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_rewind: Fix some problems when copying files >2GB. |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-08-28 14:05:29 | Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |