Re: Create language syntax is not proper in pg_dumpall and not working using pg_upgrade

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Create language syntax is not proper in pg_dumpall and not working using pg_upgrade
Date: 2017-07-25 17:10:11
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaDL-Umd+pzHkqS6Ui36QFSTbtQbwFyy0aCmGwvdZ9H-w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Is this assumption, like, documented someplace?
>
> Uh, right there?

I don't think we can expect end-users to read the code comments to
determine whether their apparently-legal SQL is fully supported.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-07-25 17:13:44 Re: Create language syntax is not proper in pg_dumpall and not working using pg_upgrade
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-07-25 17:06:54 Re: Create language syntax is not proper in pg_dumpall and not working using pg_upgrade