Re: Improve the granularity of PQsocketPoll's timeout parameter?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tristan Partin <tristan(at)partin(dot)io>, Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Improve the granularity of PQsocketPoll's timeout parameter?
Date: 2024-06-12 18:45:35
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaD=LP1rWbhYGGJsFt-b1Xg9kBSOs6UwKqjM2dDp_9_Zg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 2:25 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 1:53 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> * I decided to invent a typedef
> >> typedef pg_int64 PGusec_time_t;
>
> > I don't think it's a bad idea to have a typedef, but that particular
> > one is pretty unreadable. Mmm, let's separate some things with
> > underscores and others by a change in the capitalization conventIon!
>
> "PG" as a prefix for typedefs in libpq-fe.h is a pretty ancient
> precedent. I'm not wedded to any of the rest of it --- do you
> have a better idea?

Hmm, well, one thing I notice is that most of the other typedefs in
src/interfaces/libpq seem to do PGWordsLikeThis or PGwordsLikeThis
rather than PGwords_like_this. There are a few that randomly do
pg_words_like_this, too. But I know of no specific precedent for how a
microsecond type should be named.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2024-06-12 18:48:35 Re: On disable_cost
Previous Message Robert Haas 2024-06-12 18:33:31 Re: On disable_cost