From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: [DESIGN] ParallelAppend |
Date: | 2015-11-23 17:09:57 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaCordqW=_QVoaUw_GhQ3kpt4bPTrhvbpxGu1eT4AP5LQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Without this patch, that 0.5 (or 50% of leaders effort) is considered for
> Gather node irrespective of the number of workers or other factors, but
> I think with Patch that is no longer true and that's what I am worrying
> about.
Nope, that patch does not change that at all. We probably should, but
this patch does not.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-11-23 17:12:23 | Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-11-23 17:04:29 | Re: custom function for converting human readable sizes to bytes |