From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode for shutdown) |
Date: | 2012-04-27 19:00:07 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaBAr5g1DNqoBkqZ0OAjMpQyG43=ysasGpQKv3AJ7aeKQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I'm not necessarily opposed to commandeering the name "smart" for the
> new behavior, so that what we have to find a name for is the old "smart"
> behavior. How about
>
> slow - allow existing sessions to finish (old "smart")
> smart - allow existing transactions to finish (new)
> fast - kill active queries
> immediate - unclean shutdown
I could live with that. Really, I'd like to have fast just be the
default. But the above compromise would still be a big improvement
over what we have now, assuming the new smart becomes the default.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Noah Misch | 2012-04-27 19:05:41 | Re: psql omits row count under "\x auto" |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-04-27 18:57:53 | Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode for shutdown) |