| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amir Rohan <amir(dot)rohan(at)zoho(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc. |
| Date: | 2015-11-19 16:05:36 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaANB5py=f6Fbx4SUJFK_ZuNKmNWch+38D_QW1i_+sjDw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> In my days of Perl, it was starting to become frowned upon to call
> subroutines without parenthesizing arguments. Is that no longer the
> case? Because I notice there are many places in this patch and pre-
> existing that call psql with an argument list without parens. And it's
> a bit odd because I couldn't find any other subroutine that we're using
> in that way.
I've been coding in Perl for more than 20 years and have never heard
of such a rule.
Maybe I am not part of the "in" crowd.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2015-11-19 16:08:44 | Re: proposal: LISTEN * |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-11-19 16:03:22 | Re: [PROPOSAL] TAP test example |