On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:20 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Btw, shouldn't we have something a bit more, err, extensible for the
> design of an extensible varlena header? If we keep it down to some
> bitwise information, we'd be fine for a long time but it would be
> annoying to review again an extended design if we need to extend it
> with more data.
What do you have in mind?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com