From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: pgcon unconference / impact of block size on performance |
Date: | 2022-06-07 16:26:01 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa8WXoiQrgx0ovxR4iwtKAcfj-WfWaHSez4L1nRR7fcAQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 7:23 PM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> This opened a long discussion about possible explanations - I claimed
> one of the main factors is the adoption of flash storage, due to pretty
> fundamental differences between HDD and SSD systems. But the discussion
> concluded with an agreement to continue investigating this, so here's an
> attempt to support the claim with some measurements/data.
Interesting. I wonder if the fact that x86 machines have a 4kB page
size matters here. It seems hard to be sure because it's not something
you can really change. But there are a few of your graphs where 4kB
spikes up above any higher or lower value, and maybe that's why?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-06-07 17:02:23 | Re: How about a psql backslash command to show GUCs? |
Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-06-07 15:47:44 | Re: Add header support to text format and matching feature |