| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: removing =>(text, text) in 9.2 |
| Date: | 2011-11-02 14:49:42 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa8TkEwO8qNh0GLiUgNHsjFcn2e2L471e7mTr80KWgQSw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:36 AM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Fair enough.
>>
>> So, I tried to work up a patch for this, but I'm actually a bit
>> confused about what needs to be done here. I'll attach what I've got
>> so far as a starting point for discussion.
>
> Looks reasonable, if verbose. (Yes, the extension design currently requires that). What about doc updates?
Hmm, I was kind of expecting that to be wrong at least in some minor way.
Here's a new version with documentation updates.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| hstore-drop-arrow-v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 15.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2011-11-02 15:01:34 | Re: [PATCH] Deferrable unique constraints vs join removal -- bug? |
| Previous Message | Eric Ridge | 2011-11-02 14:49:38 | Re: Thoughts on "SELECT * EXCLUDING (...) FROM ..."? |