| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS |
| Date: | 2015-09-15 19:57:14 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa7earMWXrqfhfPFMU+O+-ObnvNUdB2UBvQfft_sPrXfA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> wrote:
> Also, we've faced issues in the past with making catalog changes due to fear
> of breaking user scripts. Instead of doubling down on that with RLS on top
> of catalog tables, would it be better to move the tables to a different
> schema, make them accessible only to superusers and put views in pg_catalog?
Uggh. -1 on that option from me.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-09-15 20:00:53 | Re: Multi-tenancy with RLS |
| Previous Message | Jesper Pedersen | 2015-09-15 19:51:38 | Re: Additional LWLOCK_STATS statistics |