Re: refactoring basebackup.c

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Date: 2021-11-02 16:34:05
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa5qfmAyKSVFOrz9RNvc=c5hV6KTyYkrC829g6sOATohA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 10:32 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Looks pretty good. I think you should work on stuff like documentation
> and tests, and I need to do some work on that stuff, too. Also, I
> think you should try to figure out how to support different
> compression levels.

On second thought, maybe we don't need to do this. There's a thread on
"Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression" which concluded that
supporting different compression levels was unnecessary.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2021-11-02 16:34:30 make tuplestore helper function
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-11-02 16:31:47 Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression