From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive |
Date: | 2015-07-27 18:36:31 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa5deqVg9-tDvJPxRuZ9Sz32iqGgmYAXTpiSRr+uYVgZw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> David Rowley wrote:
>> I've not looked into the feasibility of it, but if it were also possible to
>> have a "waiting_for" column which would store the process ID of the process
>> that's holding a lock that this process is waiting on, then it would be
>> possible for some smart guy to write some code which draws beautiful
>> graphs, perhaps in Pg Admin 4 of which processes are blocking other
>> processes. I imagine this as a chart with an icon for each process.
>> Processes waiting on locks being released would have an arrow pointing to
>> their blocking process, if we clicked on that blocking process we could see
>> the query that it's running and various other properties that are existing
>> columns in pg_stat_activity.
>
> I think this is already possible, is it not? You just have to look for
> an identically-identified pg_locks entry with granted=true. That gives
> you a PID and vxid/xid. You can self-join pg_locks with that, and join
> to pg_stat_activity.
>
> I remember we discussed having a layer of system views on top of
> pg_stat_activity and pg_locks, probably defined recursively, that would
> show the full graph of waiters/lockers.
It isn't necessarily the case that A is waiting for a unique process
B. It could well be the case that A wants AccessExclusiveLock and
many processes hold a variety of other lock types.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2015-07-27 18:37:48 | Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-07-27 18:32:40 | Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive |