| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hao Zhang <zhrt1446384557(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] plpython function causes server panic |
| Date: | 2024-03-25 15:50:42 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa4bhNFe7cU8_MnLx-JEC3aRciq3kXnJbHUJQ4j9-xgWA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:36 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> By that logic, we should rip out every Assert in the system, as well
> as all of the (extensive) resource leak checking that already happens
> during CommitTransaction. We've always felt that those leak checks
> were worth the cost to help us find bugs --- which they have done and
> still do from time to time. I don't see why this case is different,
> especially when the added cost compared to HEAD is not much more than
> one C function call.
Well, I explained why *I* thought it was different, but obviously you
don't agree.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-03-25 16:01:28 | Re: documentation structure |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-03-25 15:49:00 | Re: pgsql: Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots. |