| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Subject: | Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq |
| Date: | 2021-07-29 16:04:01 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa476xJHMtWbaGXoYH=ghtmhQA67aWXDXP6PrrrWe2Yjw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 9:57 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> In the case at hand, I'd personally avoid a ternary op for the first
> assignment because then the line would run over 80 characters, and
> you'd have to make decisions about where to break it. (We don't have
> a standardized convention about that, and none of the alternatives
> look very good to my eye.)
This is exactly why I rarely use ?:
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-07-29 16:12:51 | Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2021-07-29 16:00:36 | Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly |