Re: WIP: Access method extendability

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Access method extendability
Date: 2016-03-22 21:10:11
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa2VLJPXmCS+NO4z0NpZSbMe0PoeLYJtxqWg4vNVyOKUQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> And then Alexander posted this version, without any discussion that
>> evidenced that those old objections were overridden. What happened
>> here? Did somebody discuss this in unarchived meetings? If so, it
>> would be good to know about that in this thread.
>
> After that Tom Lane committed very huge patch about rework AM API. One of
> aims of this patch was support for CREATE ACCESS METHOD command.
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=65c5fcd353a859da9e61bfb2b92a99f12937de3b
> I've initially positioned this patch as refactoring for support CREATE
> ACCESS METHOD command.
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAPpHfdtLiSXmXk2b4tW+4+No_1-T0raO5fOYszhO6+Sn2Om+xw@mail.gmail.com
> During discussing Tom mentioned future CREATE ACCESS METHOD command.
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/16164.1439222900@sss.pgh.pa.us
> I don't think Tom would put so much efforts in this direction if he would
> remain opposed to this command.

Yeah, I rather thought we had consensus on that.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-03-22 21:15:41 Re: WIP: Access method extendability
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-03-22 21:09:52 Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)