On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> It makes more sense of you mentally separate between filename(s) and file contents. Having to do filesystem metatata transactions for an fsync intended to sync contents would be annoying...
I thought that's why there's fdatasync.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company