From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: patch: shared session variables |
Date: | 2012-08-30 19:01:11 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa0uMYyB8EZ9kAw_iUsjyH6g668cSOJzAOUqm9NMW6hsQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2012/8/30 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> patch that implements "shared" client/server session variables
>>
>> I don't really see what we can do with this that we can't do without this.
>
> a motivation for this patch was discussion about parametrised DO
> statement - and simple possibility of access to host variables (psql)
> variables from server - PL scripts.
>
> It is based on Tom's and Magnus's ideas - it is secure, because only
> variables explicitly mentioned in shared namespace are "shared".
Sure, but you could get to the same place by issuing a SET command for
just the particular variable you want to use with DO. You don't
really need a magic facility for it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-08-30 19:05:36 | Re: Proof of concept: auto updatable views |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-08-30 18:58:30 | Re: Wiki link for max_connections? (Fwd: Re: [ADMIN] PostgreSQL oom_adj postmaster process to -17) |