Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve access to parallel query from procedural languages.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve access to parallel query from procedural languages.
Date: 2017-03-28 15:35:15
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa0JQ_P-6yooNTMfgXDSE04goj_pEP5qPioZ3qobCBuvA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Rafia Sabih
<rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> If it's just that they are relying on unsynchronized global variables,
>> then it's sufficient to mark them parallel-restricted ('r'). Do we
>> really need to go all the way to parallel-unsafe ('u')?
>>
> Done.

OK, but don't pg_event_trigger_dropped_objects and
pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands need the same treatment?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2017-03-28 15:59:33 pgsql: Altering default privileges on schemas
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-03-28 15:16:22 pgsql: dblink: Fix error reporting

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-03-28 15:37:42 Re: Monitoring roles patch
Previous Message Dave Page 2017-03-28 15:34:00 Re: Monitoring roles patch