From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: making EXPLAIN extensible |
Date: | 2025-03-18 13:33:21 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa-6bBzeLM4k5AAOFUfsw9ETEUspWA7v0R1iRCMfr-BKw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 8:02 AM Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Some questions:
> 1. I think, hooks ExplainOneQuery_hook_type, explain_per_plan_hook_type,
> explain_per_node_hook_type deserve to be moved to explain_format.h
> At least, inside the hook, we usually use functions like ExplainProperty.
-1, because the hooks will be called from explain.c, not explain_state.c.
> 2. In my patch I inserted the hook before the line 1894:
> /* in text format, the first line ends here */
> Why have you chosen a different way? I don't have specific reasons to
> insist, except the extension data right under the node looks better to
> me personally.
Tom discusses why we shouldn't try to add to the first line in
http://postgr.es/m/2234935.1741809008@sss.pgh.pa.us and I'm fully in
agreement.
I've committed 0001 and 0002 for now. The additional hook for
cross-option validation can be added in a separate commit. v6-0003,
now v7-0001, needs more substantive review before commit. I hope it
gets some, and soon.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v7-0001-pg_overexplain-Additional-EXPLAIN-options-for-deb.patch | application/octet-stream | 59.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2025-03-18 13:33:56 | Re: Add -k/--link option to pg_combinebackup |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2025-03-18 13:27:47 | Re: Add -k/--link option to pg_combinebackup |