From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Timothy Garnett <tgarnett(at)panjiva(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Re: BUG #12990: Missing pg_multixact/members files (appears to have wrapped, then truncated) |
Date: | 2015-05-04 19:06:02 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa-2UK4+wX0g8vkp8Uf=46z8m7O4XzDQKfJd=39tvQZig@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Restricting ourselves to selecting tables to vacuum using their
> relminmxid alone makes this patch small since autovacuum already works
> that way. We *could* introduce code that would be able to spread out
> the work of vacuuming tables that happen to have identical or very
> close relminmxid (say by introducing some non-determinism or doing
> something weird based on hashing table oids and the time to explicitly
> spread the start of processing over time, or <your idea here>), but I
> didn't want to propose anything too big/complicated/clever/stupid and
> I suspect that the relminmxid values will tend to diverge over time
> (but I could be wrong about that, if they all start at 1 and then move
> forward in lockstep over long periods of time then what I propose is
> not good enough... let's see if we can find out).
So, the problem of everything moving in lockstep is one we already
have. It's actually a serious operational problem for relfrozenxid,
because you might restore your database from pg_dump or similar and
every table will have a very similar relfrozenxid and so then the
anti-wraparound logic fires for all of them at the same time. There
might be cases where MXIDs behave the same way, although I would think
it would be less common.
Anyway, solving that problem would be nice (particularly for xmin!),
but we shouldn't get into that with relation to this bug fix. It's a
problem, but one that will probably take a good deal of work to solve,
and certainly not something we would back-patch.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-05-04 20:36:50 | Re: Re: BUG #12990: Missing pg_multixact/members files (appears to have wrapped, then truncated) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-05-04 19:01:09 | Re: Re: BUG #12990: Missing pg_multixact/members files (appears to have wrapped, then truncated) |