From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Issue in postgres_fdw causing unnecessary wait for cancel request reply |
Date: | 2024-01-05 17:41:13 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa+C5Y_2bukjrPHszjkZYDVQqHvUFjWpZZywJ4S2JD1ug@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 2:04 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
> >> To clarify, are you suggesting that PQgetCancel() should
> >> only parse the parameters for TCP connections
> >> if cancel->raddr.addr.ss_family != AF_UNIX?
> >> If so, I think that's a good idea.
> >
> > You're right. I used connip in the diff because I thought it provided
> > the same condition, but in a simpler way.
>
> I made a modification to the 0001 patch. It will now allow PQgetCancel() to parse and interpret TCP connection parameters only when the connection is not made through a Unix-domain socket.
I don't really like this change. It seems to me that what this does is
decide that it's not an error to set tcp_user_timeout='a' when making
a cancel request if the connection doesn't actually use TCP. I agree
that we shouldn't try to *use* the values if they don't apply, but I'm
not sure it's a good idea to skip *sanity-checking* them when they
don't apply. For instance you can't set work_mem=ssdgjsjdg in
postgresql.conf even if you never run a query that needs work_mem.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-01-05 17:41:56 | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |
Previous Message | Schoemans Maxime | 2024-01-05 17:39:50 | Re: Implement missing join selectivity estimation for range types |