Re: design for parallel backup

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: design for parallel backup
Date: 2020-04-22 19:56:56
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZzGnK8+Z0k=maeOEnFHf6=UX=6=4aBGOTQDrQgB0ppxg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 3:03 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> The 7zip format, perhaps. Does have format level support to address what
> we were discussing earlier: "Support for solid compression, where
> multiple files of like type are compressed within a single stream, in
> order to exploit the combined redundancy inherent in similar files.".

I think that might not be a great choice. One potential problem is
that according to https://www.7-zip.org/license.txt the license is
partly LGPL, partly three-clause BSD with an advertising clause, and
partly some strange mostly-free thing with reverse-engineering
restrictions. That sounds pretty unappealing to me as a key dependency
for core technology. It also seems like it's mostly a Windows thing.
p7zip, the "port of the command line version of 7-Zip to Linux/Posix",
last released a new version in 2016. I therefore think that there is
room to question how well supported this is all going to be on the
systems where most of us work all day.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-04-22 21:43:40 Re: More efficient RI checks - take 2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-04-22 19:29:29 Re: Header / Trailer Comment Typos for M4 macros