From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: design for parallel backup |
Date: | 2020-04-22 19:56:56 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZzGnK8+Z0k=maeOEnFHf6=UX=6=4aBGOTQDrQgB0ppxg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 3:03 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> The 7zip format, perhaps. Does have format level support to address what
> we were discussing earlier: "Support for solid compression, where
> multiple files of like type are compressed within a single stream, in
> order to exploit the combined redundancy inherent in similar files.".
I think that might not be a great choice. One potential problem is
that according to https://www.7-zip.org/license.txt the license is
partly LGPL, partly three-clause BSD with an advertising clause, and
partly some strange mostly-free thing with reverse-engineering
restrictions. That sounds pretty unappealing to me as a key dependency
for core technology. It also seems like it's mostly a Windows thing.
p7zip, the "port of the command line version of 7-Zip to Linux/Posix",
last released a new version in 2016. I therefore think that there is
room to question how well supported this is all going to be on the
systems where most of us work all day.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-04-22 21:43:40 | Re: More efficient RI checks - take 2 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-22 19:29:29 | Re: Header / Trailer Comment Typos for M4 macros |