From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
Date: | 2016-11-03 15:52:29 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZyoTgro1bn40BW=pb0Kdk_vrPWQRkepUfrjz-y6tG7DA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Well, I'm not sure we've exactly reached consensus here, and you're
>> making me feel like I just kicked a puppy.
>
> It was hyperbole. I hope you found it as funny to read as I did to write.
> This is a great feature and I'm not going to make "perfect" the enemy of
> "good".
Oh, OK. Sorry, the tone did not transfer to my brain in the way you
intended it - I thought you were actually upset.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2016-11-03 16:11:16 | Re: auto_explain vs. parallel query |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-11-03 15:49:31 | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |