Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date: 2016-11-03 15:52:29
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZyoTgro1bn40BW=pb0Kdk_vrPWQRkepUfrjz-y6tG7DA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Well, I'm not sure we've exactly reached consensus here, and you're
>> making me feel like I just kicked a puppy.
>
> It was hyperbole. I hope you found it as funny to read as I did to write.
> This is a great feature and I'm not going to make "perfect" the enemy of
> "good".

Oh, OK. Sorry, the tone did not transfer to my brain in the way you
intended it - I thought you were actually upset.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2016-11-03 16:11:16 Re: auto_explain vs. parallel query
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-11-03 15:49:31 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take