Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs)
Date: 2011-09-22 15:31:36
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZxuAQ7vx+oEonSq230DyvmOGGMbNkOQSzZ2Wq1tcB=6g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> s/visca-versa/vice-versa/
> s/laods/loads/

Fixed. v4 attached.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
barrier-v4.patch application/octet-stream 16.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Vázquez 2011-09-22 15:39:09 Re: unaccent contrib
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-09-22 15:26:56 Re: [v9.2] make_greater_string() does not return a string in some cases