From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Too frequent message of pgbench -i? |
Date: | 2012-06-20 18:21:09 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZxiP0vQa+uE2h2kH9+xi3ehhTwZojjv3SGUSLgNrz5Dw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Currently pgbench -i prints following message every 10k tuples created.
>
> fprintf(stderr, "%d tuples done.\n", j);
>
> I think it's long time ago when the frequency of message seemed to be
> appropriate because computer is getting so fast these days and every
> 10k message seems to be too often for me. Can we change the frequency
> from 10k to 100k?
+1 for doing it that way. I have an old patch lying around for that.
It's one line, which seems to be about as much work as the problem
justifies.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pgbench-quiet.patch | application/octet-stream | 340 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-06-20 18:25:45 | Re: proposal and patch : support INSERT INTO...RETURNING with partitioned table using rule |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-06-20 18:20:21 | Re: Nasty, propagating POLA violation in COPY CSV HEADER |