| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Combining Aggregates |
| Date: | 2015-04-01 15:28:21 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZwDE5=ymGsF9gTU3d_BYgf7_f2CZcnUj0kupAJ9iKVgQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I've been thinking of bumping this patch to the June commitfest as the
>> patch only exists to provide the basic infrastructure for things like
>> parallel aggregation, aggregate before join, and perhaps auto updating
>> materialised views.
>>
>> It seems unlikely that any of those things will happen for 9.5.
>
> Yeah, I guess so...
>
>> Does anybody object to me moving this to June's commitfest?
>
> Not from my side FWIW. I think it actually makes sense.
+1. I'd like to devote some time to looking at this, but I don't have
the time right now. The chances that we can do something useful with
it in 9.6 seem good.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-04-01 15:40:13 | Re: Tables cannot have INSTEAD OF triggers |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2015-04-01 15:20:38 | Re: How about to have relnamespace and relrole? |