Re: Set arbitrary GUC options during initdb

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Set arbitrary GUC options during initdb
Date: 2023-01-27 20:05:20
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZw0TZOzBD=fw2N3NwGn9HWUMoysbAv5b__Rr24NMbruQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 3:02 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The string-hacking was fully as tedious as I expected. However, the
> output looks pretty nice, and this does have the advantage that the
> pre-programmed substitutions become a lot more robust: they are no
> longer dependent on the initdb code exactly matching what is in
> postgresql.conf.sample.

Awesome! Thank you very much.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-01-27 20:06:37 Re: Optimizing PostgreSQL with LLVM's PGO+LTO
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-01-27 20:02:04 Re: Set arbitrary GUC options during initdb