From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Set arbitrary GUC options during initdb |
Date: | 2023-01-27 20:05:20 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZw0TZOzBD=fw2N3NwGn9HWUMoysbAv5b__Rr24NMbruQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 3:02 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The string-hacking was fully as tedious as I expected. However, the
> output looks pretty nice, and this does have the advantage that the
> pre-programmed substitutions become a lot more robust: they are no
> longer dependent on the initdb code exactly matching what is in
> postgresql.conf.sample.
Awesome! Thank you very much.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-27 20:06:37 | Re: Optimizing PostgreSQL with LLVM's PGO+LTO |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-27 20:02:04 | Re: Set arbitrary GUC options during initdb |