| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken) |
| Date: | 2017-05-31 21:59:47 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZu80Sg2_P45Ort5yXwQe+t5NA=+JsBUEyqCue-sBDjgQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> I would definitely suggest putting it in HEAD (and thus, v10) for a while to
> get some real world exposure before backpatching. But if it does work out
> well in the end, then we can certainly consider backpatching it. But given
> the difficulty in reliably reproducing the problem etc, I think it's a good
> idea to give it some proper real world experience in 10 first.
So, are you going to, perhaps, commit this? Or who is picking this up?
/me knows precious little about Windows.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2017-05-31 22:06:06 | Re: pg_class.relpartbound definition overly brittle |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-31 21:55:06 | Re: UPDATE of partition key |