Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums
Date: 2017-11-24 15:55:08
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZtsZLMd8ku2fwjf=B9Txz8CKCLNkbmz1yzMy7CMU_eEg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Yes, my concern here is how many column we can allow in a stats
> view. I think I'm a bit too warried about that.

I think that's a good thing to worry about. In the past, Tom has
expressed reluctance to make stats tables that have a row per table
any wider at all, IIRC.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-11-24 16:07:56 Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE of partition key
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-11-24 15:49:07 Re: default range partition and constraint exclusion