From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql: bogus descriptions displayed by \d+ |
Date: | 2011-07-27 15:21:52 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZsSk8f8skPezXLMWx2K0w=RbVb2_toHFkYNycH-hDUFg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think this is basically the right approach but I found what you did
>> here a bit wordy, so I simplified it, committed it, and back-patched
>> to 9.0 with suitable adjustment. Hopefully I didn't simplify it into
>> a form you don't like.
>
> That looks fine. Minor grammar quibble about:
>
> + When commenting on a column,
> + <replaceable class="parameter">relation_name</replaceable> must refer
> + to a table, view, composite types, or foreign table.
>
> "types" should probably be the singular "type".
Woops. That was dumb. Fixed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-07-27 15:30:02 | Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-07-27 14:51:13 | Re: Pull up aggregate sublink (was: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery)) |