Re: psql: bogus descriptions displayed by \d+

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql: bogus descriptions displayed by \d+
Date: 2011-07-27 15:21:52
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZsSk8f8skPezXLMWx2K0w=RbVb2_toHFkYNycH-hDUFg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think this is basically the right approach but I found what you did
>> here a bit wordy, so I simplified it, committed it, and back-patched
>> to 9.0 with suitable adjustment.  Hopefully I didn't simplify it into
>> a form you don't like.
>
> That looks fine. Minor grammar quibble about:
>
> +      When commenting on a column,
> +      <replaceable class="parameter">relation_name</replaceable> must refer
> +      to a table, view, composite types, or foreign table.
>
> "types" should probably be the singular "type".

Woops. That was dumb. Fixed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-07-27 15:30:02 Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-07-27 14:51:13 Re: Pull up aggregate sublink (was: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery))