From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: possible dsm bug in dsm_attach() |
Date: | 2015-04-02 14:44:42 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZs32jfy6rcvx3f8+d9ZJxBusf7iZ0PGnt3JLvmm5D6PA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am facing an issue in case we need to create many segments for
> large inheritance hierarchy. Attached patch fixes the problem for me.
Sigh. You'd think I'd be able to write a 30-line patch without
introducing not one but two stupid bugs. But if you did think that,
you'd be wrong.
Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-04-02 14:46:10 | Re: Why SyncRepWakeQueue is not static? |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-04-02 14:42:58 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Centralize definition of integer limits. |