| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
| Cc: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ilya Kosmodemiansky <hydrobiont(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Add LSN <-> time conversion functionality |
| Date: | 2024-08-09 00:53:30 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZqrhxdff6s19Q9ewPH9Gv4U-s44jdgxt1uY+haP3XwAg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 8:39 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> wrote:
> Is there a reason not to make this just another SLRU, just like we do
> for commit_ts? I'm not saying it's perfect, but it's an approach we
> already use to solve these issues.
An SLRU is essentially an infinitely large array that grows at one end
and shrinks at the other -- but this is a fixed-size data structure.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jian he | 2024-08-09 00:57:39 | Re: Detailed release notes |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2024-08-09 00:39:24 | Re: Add LSN <-> time conversion functionality |