Re: Command Triggers, patch v11

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Command Triggers, patch v11
Date: 2012-03-14 03:41:39
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZqKUoU2H-61x1Dqs-U+HQekvPOo0YYgrDfe_figO-9fw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Generally, uppon rereading, I have to say that I am not very happy with the
> decision that ANY triggers are fired from other places than the specific
> triggers. That seams to be a rather dangerous/confusing route to me.

I agree. I think that's a complete non-starter.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2012-03-14 03:42:26 Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-03-14 03:18:59 Re: wal_buffers, redux