From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Евгений Шишкин <itparanoia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods |
Date: | 2017-12-12 20:52:01 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZqJYP+othk0c-r6acjVWWvBoxkWm5eHLUE=8VyezQKKw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> OK, but NOTICE that presumably unexpected table rewrite takes place could be
> still useful.
I'm not going to complain too much about that, but I think that's
mostly a failure of expectation rather than a real problem. If the
documentation says what the user should expect, and they expect
something else, tough luck for them.
> Also we probably should add some view that will expose compression methods
> whose are currently preserved for columns. So that user can correctly
> construct SET COMPRESSION query that doesn't rewrites table without digging
> into internals (like directly querying pg_depend).
Yes. I wonder if \d or \d+ can show it somehow.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-12-12 21:03:36 | Re: Error generating coverage report |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-12-12 20:49:53 | Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit |