From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Concurrency bug with vacuum full (cluster) and toast |
Date: | 2019-03-19 15:48:26 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZpZ4UqDkC=huuyPxdn28rpWLGX5_mnokNBF21i8Qk_4w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:53 PM Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> I've discovered bug, when vacuum full fails with error, because it
> couldn't find toast chunks deleted by itself. That happens because
> cluster_rel() sets OldestXmin, but toast accesses gets snapshot later
> and independently. That causes heap_page_prune_opt() to clean chunks,
> which rebuild_relation() expects to exist. This bug very rarely
> happens on busy systems which actively update toast values. But I
> found way to reliably reproduce it using debugger.
Boy, I really feel like we've talked about this before. These are
somewhat-related discussions, but none of them are exactly the same
thing:
http://postgr.es/m/1335.1304187758@sss.pgh.pa.us
http://postgr.es/m/20362.1359747327@sss.pgh.pa.us
http://postgr.es/m/87in8nec96.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
I don't know whether we've actually talked about this precise problem
before and I just can't find the thread, or whether I'm confusing what
you've found here with some closely-related issue.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-03-19 15:51:50 | Re: pg_upgrade version checking questions |
Previous Message | Chris Travers | 2019-03-19 15:44:40 | Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods |